Pages

Saturday, October 22, 2022

Mary - the Blessed Virgin


The lack of a mother in Evangelicalism is one of the main things that God used to bring me into the Church. That might be unusual. Not sure. It’s not just that most of what the Church and even the reformers believed about the Blessed Virgin has been scrubbed from Evangelical teaching. The Church as our mother is gone as well. Along with it, motherhood itself to a large degree, although there are many Christian women of all kinds returning to the home. I could not find a coherent theology and philosophy of sex and gender in Evangelicalism. IMO, that lack of coherence has done damage to Evangelicalism. Evangelicals understand the aspect of complimentarity in a marriage. Man and women complement one another. 

Some Evangelicals understand that Christianity is patriarchal, and it is. What I didn’t see in Evangelicalism is matriarchy. Patriarchal Evangelicalism is odd and has led to a number of epic failures in families. No, not all, but I could tell you stories of amazing successes and some horrible, horrible failures - but I won’t here. Are there more successes than failures? I have no way to know that. The patriarchal movement is not my cup of tea, even though I read a lot of the literature on the subject. I always wondered where the matriarch was. If there are patriarchs, there have to be matriarchs.

Motherhood is in Evangelicalism in a way, but not like in Catholicism. Catholics see motherhood and fatherhood on full display every time we enter a church building. Our Blessed Mother is at Jesus’ right hand, and Jesus’ foster father, Joseph is at His left hand. Father, Mother, Son - the nuclear family. The traditional Holy Family looks down on us every time Mass is celebrated. It’s a strong and unmistakable statement. Father. Mother. Children. It’s been that way since the beginning of creation.

St. Pope JP II lost his mother and after that he found comfort in our Blessed Mother. I can’t find where I read that, so take it FWIW. I heard him preach in Santiago de Chile back in 1987. I was watching on television, but what struck me was how Christ centered it was. It didn’t make sense since his motto was  “Totus Tuus which is "the abbreviated version of the Marian consecration according to de Montfort. Now it makes more sense to me. Mary leads us to Christ. I am not Marian per se, but I understand how being Christ centered and Marian are not necessarily mutually exclusive. 

The fact that this great man found comfort in Mary as his mother makes sense to me. My mother passed away. I felt like a motherless child. I was happy to read JP’s comments about how he devoted himself to our Blessed Mother. Make of it what you will. Here’s something that no longer made sense to me. Evangelicals think that Mary is dead. It is a grave sin to pray to the dead. Catholics pray to the dead saints, so we are sinning when we pray to saints. 

Jesus taught that God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob who are not dead. They are alive with God. There’s more to it than that, but the gist of it is that Catholics are not praying to dead saints.

Protestants tune out Catholics at that point, but anyway... Catholics don’t worship Mary and the saints alive in Heaven with God, either. We ask them to pray for us as we would ask other Christians for prayer, but that’s another point that doesn’t make sense to Protestants. We respect them because they are in God’s presence in a way that we are not yet.

Even sola scriptura believers should recognize the contradiction in “saints are dead, so praying to them is necromancy". God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Things didn’t add up for me anymore since prayer to the saints as in asking them for prayer is a very ancient practice in the Church. The Church is very clear about not worshipping any created being, not even the Blessed Virgin. Asking for a christian to pray for us is not worship. In that sense we pray to the saints - and I do. We usually ask Christians that we respect to pray for us, knowing that it is likely they will. How can all the ancient saints and millions of Christins through the ages be practicing idolatry and necromancy by praying to the Saints in Heaven? It’s possible, but not likely. I believe that I am in good company. Make of it what you will.

Protestants strain the gnat when they focus on dogmatic pronouncements. The problems in understanding what the Church is teaching are much deeper than whether or not Mary is perpetually Virgin and other dogmas that non Catholic Christians find odd and wrong. The confusion in Protestantism, IMO goes to the very nature of what it means to be a man and woman created in the image of God. Was Mary just a body that God used to make a baby? What does that say about God? ...and so forth. What IS woman? What IS man? etc... Some Protestants like to discuss those deeper issues, but still miss the mark, IMO. 

Enter a Catholic Church. Contemplate the images at the front of the sanctuary. Understand why they are there.

https://aleteia.org/2016/07/08/let-us-pray-the-earliest-known-marian-prayer/

A LOT more could be said, and has been said. These are not some secret doctrines that have been hidden from humanity and just now revealed. The practice of venerating and praying to the Blessed Virgin Mary goes way back to the early Church. Here’s an interesting article talking about a prayer to Mary that dates from AD 250. I’ll end with this.

Beneath thy compassion,
 we take refuge, O Mother of God: do not despise our petitions in time of trouble, but rescue us from dangers,only pure one, only blessed one.

The earliest known Marian Prayer, like the Gospels, is written in Greek. That is why, in it, the Virgin Mary is called “Θεοτοκος”, the “Bearer of God”, which is already a theologically relevant detail (as we will try to explain). This prayer, as explained on Trisagion Film’s Website, was “found on a fragment of papyrus that dates all the way back to approximately AD 250”, only a couple of centuries after the Death and Resurrection of Christ, approximately a century before Constantine and the Edict of Milan but, more importantly, two centuries before the Third Ecumenical Council, the Council of Ephesus, in which the Virgin Mary was proclaimed “Mother of God”.

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Sola Scriptura

Scripture is infallible because it is God breathed. The Holy Spirit is its Divine Author. There are numerous human authors that God spoke through. They spoke infallibly because God cannot fail and His Word never fails.


The Holy Spirit is what makes the Church infallible as well. Does that mean that she never makes mistakes? Of course not, but she will not fail as per the words of Jesus. The gates of hell will not prevail against her. All Bible Christians believe that - including or especially Catholics.

I think that in these discussions on Scripture vs. Tradition, the origin of Scripture and the origin of the Church gets all muddled and clouded. Neither are man-made, but human beings distort, change, and add all kinds of stuff to interpretations. The basics are not man made. The Church and Scripture work together to clear up errors and misunderstandings. The great Ecumenical Councils are examples of how the Church works to clear up errors.

The traditional Christian understanding is that both the Church and Scripture are infallible. It’s like a marriage, and you can’t have one without the other.

Protestants and all other non Catholic Christians accept at some level the idea of inter denominationalism or trans denominationalism. Few think that theirs is the only true Church, but each denomination believes that their way is either good or the best if not the only. Few denominations refuse to have any contact with other congregations outside their own groups.

There are problems with that, but at least there is some concept of the fact that all Christians, all believers in Christ as our Savior are part of the body of Christ.

The main problem in my understanding of denominationalism is the fact that Jesus chose a Bride, not a haram. There is only one Church, not many churches. Scripture clearly teaches that.

See Eph. 4:1-6

Questions:
1. Which came first? Apostolic tradition or the New Testament? 

2. In other words, which came first? The formation of the Church, or the writing of the New Testament? 

3. Who decided what books belong in the NT canon?


Are either of them - Church and Scripture - fallible? Will either of them fail and disappear, or will both enter eternity?

Both the Church and the Word of God are eternal.

The two stand or fall together. God’s Word is true. The Church is pillar and ground of the truth. Both Scripture and Church are infallible. Scripture teaches that. The Church teaches that.

1 Timothy 3:14, 15 

For example. St. Thomas Aquinas' primary appeal was to Jesus’ words as recorded in Scripture for his understanding of transubstantiation.

Here’s how I see it. Jesus said clearly “this is my body, this is my blood”.

Jesus said it. I believe it. 

How does that work? Thomas explained how that worked. How can bread be real bread and essentially the body of Christ at the same time? A similar question is how can Jesus be both God and Man?


Notice the “sola fides” in the text of Thomas’ hymn, Pange lingua. Faith in what? Faith in the words of Jesus. Take them at face value. Work out your understanding of the meaning from that point forward. It CAN literally mean what Jesus said it means. We can be partaking of the literal body and blood of Jesus in the Eucharist. If the Creator, Maker, and Sustainer of the universe says so, then it is so. He created everything out of nothing after all.

What God says, is.

Protestants take Jesus’ words as more figurative than literal, or totally figurative, but Jesus’ words are the correct starting point. Church Tradition must not contradict the very words of Jesus as they were preserved by the Church and then written down in Scripture.

Verbum caro, panem verum
Verbo carnem éfficit:
Fitque sanguis Christi merum,
Et si sensus déficit,
Ad firmándum cor sincérum
Sola fides súfficit.

The Word as Flesh makes true bread
into flesh by a word
and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ.
And if sense is deficient
to strengthen a sincere heart
Faith alone suffices.

Sunday, September 11, 2022

Sola Scriptura - some random ideas - fact check me if you wish

Most Protestants don’t think back to the time when there was no New Testament. What guided the Church until the NT Canon was identified? That would be Tradition which included OT Scripture - including the Septuagint.  What part does Tradition play now? Most don’t know that sola scriptura doesn’t mean only Scripture. It means that the Bible is the only infallible rule of faith and practice. All other authorities are fallible. And that’s a problem.  In the Bible the Holy Spirit is said to have breathed out Scripture, making it infallible and absolutely authoritative. In the Bible the Holy Spirit birthed the Church and filled her with infallible discernment, leading her into all truth.  The common thread? The work of the Holy Spirit who cannot lie or fail.  It’s absurd to say that Scripture is infallible and God-breathed, but the Church is fallible and unable to discern what truth is. The fallible-infallible model of sola scriptura is self refuting.


Even more absurd is the fact that most Protestants do accept the fact that the Church is led into all truth and somehow got the NT Canon right. Even the Lutheran church saw the madness that Luther was leading it into with his ideas on what books belonged and what books did not belong in the NT! The guy was on a tear.


Hebrews, James, Jude, Revelation - and maybe others - didn’t meet his criteria, but the Lutheran church had the good sense to veto him on that.


Most don’t know the history of the OT canon - or canons, rather - and how they came to be. Most don’t know that the Protestant OT Canon is not older than the 1st century AD.


Protestant tradition about the OT canon was determined by Martin Luther and then Bible publishers in the 19th Century. I’ve written about that in other posts. Luther decided that the Hebrew OT was the correct canon. There are problems with that, like the fact that NT writers quoted and referenced the Greek OT.


Here’s a list of Deuterocanonical references in the NT. This is a big deal. If the books that Luther removed from their place in the OT and put in the back of his Bible translation are really part of the OT canon, then there’s a big problem for Protestants’ view of sola scriptura.

No matter. Read your Bible - the one sitting on your shelf that has been unopened. All Christians have a common NT canon, so don’t worry about the other stuff. Take and read - which is what St. Augustine did.


Ask the Holy Spirit to enlighten you. But be careful what teachers you choose to help you.


Stick with the tried and true. Get familiar with the Church fathers especially St. Augustine and St. Chrysostom. They are clear and it’s as if they were speaking to us today. Yes, the Holy Spirit will enlighten you, but not all on your own.


Go to the local perish. Take an RCIA class. Learn what the Church teaches.



Thursday, April 21, 2022

Memorizing and Bible reading or listening

 Phone apps for Bible reading and memorization are helpful tools. Catholic Christians are Bible Christians, too, don’t you know. 

1. I have been using the Bible Memory app. My personal list includes Peace, Prayers of the Apostles, The 10 Commandments, The Armor of God, The Beatitudes, The Lord’s Prayer, The Love Chapter, Top 100 Verses, Uncategorized.


It’s easy to use. You can memorize from any Bible translation you wish. Catholics and Protestants should find this app to be mostly neutral. Its focus is memorization. 


2. The Amen app  is put out by the Augustine Institute. 

It’s free. I especially like the fact that the ESV is the Bible version that they use. Augustine Institute also also publishes a Bible in a Year that uses the English Standard Version Catholic Edition. 

Right now I listen to their recorded daily Mass readings and their Daily Reflections. 

Bible thumpers turned Catholic - or not - should love this app. It’s mildly Protestant friendly. 


3. The Hallow app  from Ascension is similar to the Amen app, but a little more contemplative, a little more Charismatic. There are some well known names doing readings for them. 

This app uses the Revised Standard Version, 2nd Catholic Edition.

Ascension publishes the Great Adventure Catholic Bible. Most Bible thumpers familiar with dispensationalism will appreciate the format. It’s not exactly dispensational, but it uses a Bible timeline similar to that school of thought. 

Jeff Cavins is the main influencer. 

This app is quite Protestant friendly. 

4. I also use the You Version Bible app. It’s okay, but not very Catholic friendly. 

---------------------------------------------------

So, that’s where I’m at as far as Bible apps are concerned. Last year I went through the whole Bible with Father Mike and Jeff Cavins on the Hallow app. 


This year I started with the Bible in a Year on the Amen app. I made it through January. Now I just do the Daily Mass Readings and little devotional that goes along with it. 


I got the Bible in a Year published by the Augustine Institute. The little devotional summaries that accompany each day’s readings are quite fantastic. Maybe I’ll do February in May. 


After going through the whole Bible with Fr. Mike it dawned on me. Protestants who ignore the Deuterocanonical books are missing out! Reading them won’t hurt anyone. No one says that they are of the devil - at least I don’t think so. There is probably someone who says that now that I think of it. 

I like the fact that many Catholics are seeing the need to read through the whole Bible systematically. I feel like that’s kind of a new thing.