Pages

Saturday, October 22, 2022

Mary - the Blessed Virgin


The lack of a mother in Evangelicalism is one of the main things that God used to bring me into the Church. That might be unusual. Not sure. It’s not just that most of what the Church and even the reformers believed about the Blessed Virgin has been scrubbed from Evangelical teaching. The Church as our mother is gone as well. Along with it, motherhood itself to a large degree, although there are many Christian women of all kinds returning to the home. I could not find a coherent theology and philosophy of sex and gender in Evangelicalism. IMO, that lack of coherence has done damage to Evangelicalism. Evangelicals understand the aspect of complimentarity in a marriage. Man and women complement one another. 

Some Evangelicals understand that Christianity is patriarchal, and it is. What I didn’t see in Evangelicalism is matriarchy. Patriarchal Evangelicalism is odd and has led to a number of epic failures in families. No, not all, but I could tell you stories of amazing successes and some horrible, horrible failures - but I won’t here. Are there more successes than failures? I have no way to know that. The patriarchal movement is not my cup of tea, even though I read a lot of the literature on the subject. I always wondered where the matriarch was. If there are patriarchs, there have to be matriarchs.

Motherhood is in Evangelicalism in a way, but not like in Catholicism. Catholics see motherhood and fatherhood on full display every time we enter a church building. Our Blessed Mother is at Jesus’ right hand, and Jesus’ foster father, Joseph is at His left hand. Father, Mother, Son - the nuclear family. The traditional Holy Family looks down on us every time Mass is celebrated. It’s a strong and unmistakable statement. Father. Mother. Children. It’s been that way since the beginning of creation.

St. Pope JP II lost his mother and after that he found comfort in our Blessed Mother. I can’t find where I read that, so take it FWIW. I heard him preach in Santiago de Chile back in 1987. I was watching on television, but what struck me was how Christ centered it was. It didn’t make sense since his motto was  “Totus Tuus which is "the abbreviated version of the Marian consecration according to de Montfort. Now it makes more sense to me. Mary leads us to Christ. I am not Marian per se, but I understand how being Christ centered and Marian are not necessarily mutually exclusive. 

The fact that this great man found comfort in Mary as his mother makes sense to me. My mother passed away. I felt like a motherless child. I was happy to read JP’s comments about how he devoted himself to our Blessed Mother. Make of it what you will. Here’s something that no longer made sense to me. Evangelicals think that Mary is dead. It is a grave sin to pray to the dead. Catholics pray to the dead saints, so we are sinning when we pray to saints. 

Jesus taught that God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob who are not dead. They are alive with God. There’s more to it than that, but the gist of it is that Catholics are not praying to dead saints.

Protestants tune out Catholics at that point, but anyway... Catholics don’t worship Mary and the saints alive in Heaven with God, either. We ask them to pray for us as we would ask other Christians for prayer, but that’s another point that doesn’t make sense to Protestants. We respect them because they are in God’s presence in a way that we are not yet.

Even sola scriptura believers should recognize the contradiction in “saints are dead, so praying to them is necromancy". God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Things didn’t add up for me anymore since prayer to the saints as in asking them for prayer is a very ancient practice in the Church. The Church is very clear about not worshipping any created being, not even the Blessed Virgin. Asking for a christian to pray for us is not worship. In that sense we pray to the saints - and I do. We usually ask Christians that we respect to pray for us, knowing that it is likely they will. How can all the ancient saints and millions of Christins through the ages be practicing idolatry and necromancy by praying to the Saints in Heaven? It’s possible, but not likely. I believe that I am in good company. Make of it what you will.

Protestants strain the gnat when they focus on dogmatic pronouncements. The problems in understanding what the Church is teaching are much deeper than whether or not Mary is perpetually Virgin and other dogmas that non Catholic Christians find odd and wrong. The confusion in Protestantism, IMO goes to the very nature of what it means to be a man and woman created in the image of God. Was Mary just a body that God used to make a baby? What does that say about God? ...and so forth. What IS woman? What IS man? etc... Some Protestants like to discuss those deeper issues, but still miss the mark, IMO. 

Enter a Catholic Church. Contemplate the images at the front of the sanctuary. Understand why they are there.

https://aleteia.org/2016/07/08/let-us-pray-the-earliest-known-marian-prayer/

A LOT more could be said, and has been said. These are not some secret doctrines that have been hidden from humanity and just now revealed. The practice of venerating and praying to the Blessed Virgin Mary goes way back to the early Church. Here’s an interesting article talking about a prayer to Mary that dates from AD 250. I’ll end with this.

Beneath thy compassion,
 we take refuge, O Mother of God: do not despise our petitions in time of trouble, but rescue us from dangers,only pure one, only blessed one.

The earliest known Marian Prayer, like the Gospels, is written in Greek. That is why, in it, the Virgin Mary is called “Θεοτοκος”, the “Bearer of God”, which is already a theologically relevant detail (as we will try to explain). This prayer, as explained on Trisagion Film’s Website, was “found on a fragment of papyrus that dates all the way back to approximately AD 250”, only a couple of centuries after the Death and Resurrection of Christ, approximately a century before Constantine and the Edict of Milan but, more importantly, two centuries before the Third Ecumenical Council, the Council of Ephesus, in which the Virgin Mary was proclaimed “Mother of God”.

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Sola Scriptura

Scripture is infallible because it is God breathed. The Holy Spirit is its Divine Author. There are numerous human authors that God spoke through. They spoke infallibly because God cannot fail and His Word never fails.


The Holy Spirit is what makes the Church infallible as well. Does that mean that she never makes mistakes? Of course not, but she will not fail as per the words of Jesus. The gates of hell will not prevail against her. All Bible Christians believe that - including or especially Catholics.

I think that in these discussions on Scripture vs. Tradition, the origin of Scripture and the origin of the Church gets all muddled and clouded. Neither are man-made, but human beings distort, change, and add all kinds of stuff to interpretations. The basics are not man made. The Church and Scripture work together to clear up errors and misunderstandings. The great Ecumenical Councils are examples of how the Church works to clear up errors.

The traditional Christian understanding is that both the Church and Scripture are infallible. It’s like a marriage, and you can’t have one without the other.

Protestants and all other non Catholic Christians accept at some level the idea of inter denominationalism or trans denominationalism. Few think that theirs is the only true Church, but each denomination believes that their way is either good or the best if not the only. Few denominations refuse to have any contact with other congregations outside their own groups.

There are problems with that, but at least there is some concept of the fact that all Christians, all believers in Christ as our Savior are part of the body of Christ.

The main problem in my understanding of denominationalism is the fact that Jesus chose a Bride, not a haram. There is only one Church, not many churches. Scripture clearly teaches that.

See Eph. 4:1-6

Questions:
1. Which came first? Apostolic tradition or the New Testament? 

2. In other words, which came first? The formation of the Church, or the writing of the New Testament? 

3. Who decided what books belong in the NT canon?


Are either of them - Church and Scripture - fallible? Will either of them fail and disappear, or will both enter eternity?

Both the Church and the Word of God are eternal.

The two stand or fall together. God’s Word is true. The Church is pillar and ground of the truth. Both Scripture and Church are infallible. Scripture teaches that. The Church teaches that.

1 Timothy 3:14, 15 

For example. St. Thomas Aquinas' primary appeal was to Jesus’ words as recorded in Scripture for his understanding of transubstantiation.

Here’s how I see it. Jesus said clearly “this is my body, this is my blood”.

Jesus said it. I believe it. 

How does that work? Thomas explained how that worked. How can bread be real bread and essentially the body of Christ at the same time? A similar question is how can Jesus be both God and Man?


Notice the “sola fides” in the text of Thomas’ hymn, Pange lingua. Faith in what? Faith in the words of Jesus. Take them at face value. Work out your understanding of the meaning from that point forward. It CAN literally mean what Jesus said it means. We can be partaking of the literal body and blood of Jesus in the Eucharist. If the Creator, Maker, and Sustainer of the universe says so, then it is so. He created everything out of nothing after all.

What God says, is.

Protestants take Jesus’ words as more figurative than literal, or totally figurative, but Jesus’ words are the correct starting point. Church Tradition must not contradict the very words of Jesus as they were preserved by the Church and then written down in Scripture.

Verbum caro, panem verum
Verbo carnem éfficit:
Fitque sanguis Christi merum,
Et si sensus déficit,
Ad firmándum cor sincérum
Sola fides súfficit.

The Word as Flesh makes true bread
into flesh by a word
and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ.
And if sense is deficient
to strengthen a sincere heart
Faith alone suffices.

Sunday, September 11, 2022

Sola Scriptura - some random ideas - fact check me if you wish

Most Protestants don’t think back to the time when there was no New Testament. What guided the Church until the NT Canon was identified? That would be Tradition which included OT Scripture - including the Septuagint.  What part does Tradition play now? Most don’t know that sola scriptura doesn’t mean only Scripture. It means that the Bible is the only infallible rule of faith and practice. All other authorities are fallible. And that’s a problem.  In the Bible the Holy Spirit is said to have breathed out Scripture, making it infallible and absolutely authoritative. In the Bible the Holy Spirit birthed the Church and filled her with infallible discernment, leading her into all truth.  The common thread? The work of the Holy Spirit who cannot lie or fail.  It’s absurd to say that Scripture is infallible and God-breathed, but the Church is fallible and unable to discern what truth is. The fallible-infallible model of sola scriptura is self refuting.


Even more absurd is the fact that most Protestants do accept the fact that the Church is led into all truth and somehow got the NT Canon right. Even the Lutheran church saw the madness that Luther was leading it into with his ideas on what books belonged and what books did not belong in the NT! The guy was on a tear.


Hebrews, James, Jude, Revelation - and maybe others - didn’t meet his criteria, but the Lutheran church had the good sense to veto him on that.


Most don’t know the history of the OT canon - or canons, rather - and how they came to be. Most don’t know that the Protestant OT Canon is not older than the 1st century AD.


Protestant tradition about the OT canon was determined by Martin Luther and then Bible publishers in the 19th Century. I’ve written about that in other posts. Luther decided that the Hebrew OT was the correct canon. There are problems with that, like the fact that NT writers quoted and referenced the Greek OT.


Here’s a list of Deuterocanonical references in the NT. This is a big deal. If the books that Luther removed from their place in the OT and put in the back of his Bible translation are really part of the OT canon, then there’s a big problem for Protestants’ view of sola scriptura.

No matter. Read your Bible - the one sitting on your shelf that has been unopened. All Christians have a common NT canon, so don’t worry about the other stuff. Take and read - which is what St. Augustine did.


Ask the Holy Spirit to enlighten you. But be careful what teachers you choose to help you.


Stick with the tried and true. Get familiar with the Church fathers especially St. Augustine and St. Chrysostom. They are clear and it’s as if they were speaking to us today. Yes, the Holy Spirit will enlighten you, but not all on your own.


Go to the local perish. Take an RCIA class. Learn what the Church teaches.



Thursday, April 21, 2022

Memorizing and Bible reading or listening

 Phone apps for Bible reading and memorization are helpful tools. Catholic Christians are Bible Christians, too, don’t you know. 

1. I have been using the Bible Memory app. My personal list includes Peace, Prayers of the Apostles, The 10 Commandments, The Armor of God, The Beatitudes, The Lord’s Prayer, The Love Chapter, Top 100 Verses, Uncategorized.


It’s easy to use. You can memorize from any Bible translation you wish. Catholics and Protestants should find this app to be mostly neutral. Its focus is memorization. 


2. The Amen app  is put out by the Augustine Institute. 

It’s free. I especially like the fact that the ESV is the Bible version that they use. Augustine Institute also also publishes a Bible in a Year that uses the English Standard Version Catholic Edition. 

Right now I listen to their recorded daily Mass readings and their Daily Reflections. 

Bible thumpers turned Catholic - or not - should love this app. It’s mildly Protestant friendly. 


3. The Hallow app  from Ascension is similar to the Amen app, but a little more contemplative, a little more Charismatic. There are some well known names doing readings for them. 

This app uses the Revised Standard Version, 2nd Catholic Edition.

Ascension publishes the Great Adventure Catholic Bible. Most Bible thumpers familiar with dispensationalism will appreciate the format. It’s not exactly dispensational, but it uses a Bible timeline similar to that school of thought. 

Jeff Cavins is the main influencer. 

This app is quite Protestant friendly. 

4. I also use the You Version Bible app. It’s okay, but not very Catholic friendly. 

---------------------------------------------------

So, that’s where I’m at as far as Bible apps are concerned. Last year I went through the whole Bible with Father Mike and Jeff Cavins on the Hallow app. 


This year I started with the Bible in a Year on the Amen app. I made it through January. Now I just do the Daily Mass Readings and little devotional that goes along with it. 


I got the Bible in a Year published by the Augustine Institute. The little devotional summaries that accompany each day’s readings are quite fantastic. Maybe I’ll do February in May. 


After going through the whole Bible with Fr. Mike it dawned on me. Protestants who ignore the Deuterocanonical books are missing out! Reading them won’t hurt anyone. No one says that they are of the devil - at least I don’t think so. There is probably someone who says that now that I think of it. 

I like the fact that many Catholics are seeing the need to read through the whole Bible systematically. I feel like that’s kind of a new thing. 




Sunday, February 14, 2021

So far so good - Part 2 - Bible Memory

1. I am doing pretty good on going through the Bible in a non-specific period of time. I usually make it through in a year, more or less. 

So far so good. 

2. Bible memory - I keep forgetting to include that in my daily routine. So, here I go again. 

I think it’s very important to do. Just a little bit every day. 


So far so good - Part 1

 I feel a lot like this as we move into the season of Lent this week. 







Bible Confusion

Okay, I posted this on some guy’s You Tube video. He claims to be Catholic. He’s gathering a group around himself and trying to be their fearless leader in all things religious and political. I’ll post the exchange here.

He said in his video that he wanted to compare older Bible translations with newer ones to find something about something.

I expect to be banned. We shall see.

-----------------------------------------------------------

I said:

I fear that what you are trying to do with comparing Bible translations is show that the Bible has been changed. A better approach to Bible study is to actually study the Bible. If you want a good Catholic resource, Fr. Mike’s reading through the Bible podcast is excellent. If you want a good Protestant resource, then Bible Gateway is a great resource, as is the Bible app. Bible Gateway has all the translations you could imagine. Bible Gateway is good because you can line up several translations side by side and compare if you’re so inclined. There are also parallel Greek-English versions with literal translations as well. I think you’re missing the purpose of Bible study if your goal is to point out errors in translation and how eeeevil elitists are deliberately messing with the text. Meh. There was a big kerfuffle about Pope Francis changing the Lord’s Prayer! Horrors! Just like there is fake news about President Trump, there is a lot of fake news about the Pope. Many Catholics don’t like him. That’s fine, but he didn’t change the Lord’s Prayer. Then there’s the Mandela effect theory that the lion and lamb thing was changed to lion and wolf. Again. That’s nonsense. Then there are those who claim that the book of Enoch was banned! Nonsense. If it had been banned, why is it so easy to find and read? The Ethiopian Orthodox Church accepts it as inspired. The book has been around for a long time. One problem I see with it is that it’s all about judgment with little or no grace. It’s very different from the OT prophets. 

[Here’s a better explanation of the place of the book of Enoch in Church history. I should have said Ethopian Coptic Church. https://evidenceforchristianity.org/what-is-the-banned-book-of-enoch/] Some have elaborate theories about the Nephelim and all that. Great for science fiction. Not so great for building one up in the faith. I have noticed that those who get into the Book of Enoch theories get farther and farther away from Jesus. It’s not edifying except as an interesting book of ancient literature that had some influence on the Jewish culture and therefore the NT. Anyway, be careful my beloved brother. There are many false prophets out there. Don’t get sucked in.

------------------------------

He responded:

Tell you what. I'll decide for myself what my best resources will be. I will not consider your opinions to be of any value on any subject. Ok?

-----------------------------

My response:

Tell you what. The Bible is God’s Word, and your opinion does not matter, nor does mine. It is a matter of faith. I will continue to give out reliable resources on Scripture until and unless you ban me. If you are Catholic, then study the Catechism. Otherwise, quit saying you are Catholic. It is not a religion that you get to make up as you go along.

-------------------------


This guy can make up whatever he wants. What he can’t do is call it Catholic. Same goes for anyone, including me, and including even the Pope.

The Catholic position on the Canon of Scripture is clearly stated in the documents of the Council of Trent. It’s not a matter of blind acceptance of what the Church declares. There is enough evidence supporting the Church’s position to fill an Amazon warehouse and maybe more.


Again, if someone claims to be Catholic, then try to know what that means. Otherwise go ahead and be a cult of one.


BTW, the same goes for any Protestant denomination. If someone wishes to claim membership in any of them, then know what that church teaches. All of them put out statements of faith and give membership classes so people will know what is being taught and try to faithfully represent that faith.

One of the dangerous things in Christianity is an anti-traditionalist, extreme libertarian view of the faith.

I think that a false dichotomy has been set up in the minds of many. The phrase “Christianity is a relationship, not a religion”is false.

Yes. Our faith is primarily about having a right relationship with God through Jesus Christ. Yes. We enter into a relationship with Him. That relationship is compared to marriage in Ephesians 5.

25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[b]her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body. 31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”[c] 32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Our faith is also a religion.  

I grew up in the Baptist religion - for which I am extremely grateful. There are many things I still love about that religion - and yes, it is a religion. We were never taught that it was okay to not be an active member of a local congregation. In fact, we were taught that church attendance was expected of all believers in Christ. 

We just didn’t like the word “religion”, but it didn’t mean we didn’t practice our faith. It’s a question of semantics not meant to discourage church attendance or good works. Avoiding the word “religion” is part of the Baptist religion. No big deal, IMO. And my opinion is not an article of faith. 

What about the Bible? Read it. Pick up whatever copy you have lying on your shelf and read. That’s what St. Augustine did after all. 


Except the New World Translation, but even the JWs couldn’t mess the Bible up completely. 

The Bible will lead you to Christ if you allow it to. Start with the Gospels. 

----------------------------------------------------

From St. Augustine: Confessions of Saint Augustine

So was I speaking and weeping in the most bitter contrition of my heart, when, lo! I heard from a neighbouring house a voice, as of boy or girl, I know not, chanting, and oft repeating, “Take up and read; Take up and read. “ Instantly, my countenance altered, I began to think most intently whether children were wont in any kind of play to sing such words: nor could I remember ever to have heard the like. So checking the torrent of my tears, I arose; interpreting it to be no other than a command from God to open the book, and read the first chapter I should find. For I had heard of Antony, that coming in during the reading of the Gospel, he received the admonition, as if what was being read was spoken to him: Go, sell all that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come and follow me: and by such oracle he was forthwith converted unto Thee. Eagerly then I returned to the place where Alypius was sitting; for there had I laid the volume of the Apostle when I arose thence. I seized, opened, and in silence read that section on which my eyes first fell: Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying; but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, in concupiscence. No further would I read; nor needed I: for instantly at the end of this sentence, by a light as it were of serenity infused into my heart, all the darkness of doubt vanished away.


Thursday, December 26, 2019

Memory Work

It’s been awhile since I’ve blogged. 
It’s been awhile since I’ve done Scripture memory.
New Year’s Resolution? 
Maybe. 
Blog a bit some days and memorize verses?

I found an app that has commentary from the Church Fathers and St. Thomas Aquinas - all the old, dead white guys that I love. So, Thomas’ comments will influence what I say, probably. Don’t blame Thomas for anything, either.

I don’t blame any of them for what I might say. I don’t blame the Holy Spirit. 

Hopefully anyone reading this will be inspired to dig deep into Scripture. Surely you can do much better than what I write. 

Organize thoughts - as best I can by grace. 
Think about what words mean - as best I can by grace.

Grace perfects nature. 
- St. Thomas Aquinas

Start what what I have. See what God does with it. 

You can do better. I can do better. 


Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your faithful and kindle in them the fire of your love. Send forth your Spirit and they shall be created. And You shall renew the face of the earth.  

O, God, who by the light of the Holy Spirit, did instruct the hearts of the faithful, grant that by the same Holy Spirit we may be truly wise and ever enjoy His consolations, Through Christ Our Lord, Amen.


  1. Open my eyes, that I may see
  1. Glimpses of truth Thou hast for me;
  1. Place in my hands the wonderful key
  1. That shall unclasp and set me free.
  • Refrain 1:
  • Silently now I wait for Thee,
  • Ready my God, Thy will to see,
  • Open my eyes, illumine me,
  • Spirit divine!
  1. Open my ears, that I may hear
  1. Voices of truth Thou sendest clear;
  1. And while the wave notes fall on my ear,
  1. Everything false will disappear.
  • Refrain 2:
  • Silently now I wait for Thee,
  • Ready my God, Thy will to see,
  • Open my ears, illumine me,
  • Spirit divine!
  1. Open my mind, that I may read
  1. More of Thy love in word and deed;
  1. What shall I fear while yet Thou dost lead?
  1. Only for light from Thee I plead.
  • Refrain 3:
  • Silently now I wait for Thee,
  • Ready my God, Thy will to see,
  • Open my mind, illumine me,
  • Spirit divine!
  1. Open my mouth, and let me bear,
  1. Gladly the warm truth everywhere;
  1. Open my heart and let me prepare
  1. Love with Thy children thus to share.
  • Refrain 4:
  • Silently now I wait for Thee,
  • Ready my God, Thy will to see,
  • Open my heart, illumine me,
  • Spirit divine!
Romans 1
Paul, a slave of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle and set apart for the gospel of God, 

Who was Paul? Slave. Called. Apostle. 

Who did he serve? Christ Jesus. In his other writings we see that he served God’s people as well. Vertical. Horizontal relationships. His attitude was that of a servant, not a ruler even though he was an apostle with the highest level of authority in the Church besides Jesus, our Head. Peter was the leader in this highest level. 

Our egalitarian society doesn’t like talk of hierarchy. Yet there it is in the Bible. We have to deal with it if we are part of the Church. It’s for our good. 

Yet spiritually, someone at the bottom of the organizational pyramid might be far above even the Pope. The great in God’s Kingdom are those who serve. God’s ways aren’t the same as mankind's. 

Matthew 23:11The greatest among you shall be your servant.
Word association.:  Serve. Listen. Go. Preach. Share. Live. Named. Savior. Samuel (see his call in 1 Samuel 3) 

A. Paul also went by the name “Saul”. There are a number of possible reasons for this. 

It may have been his given Roman name, while Saul was his Jewish name. 
It may have been a name he took for himself after the conversion of Sergius Paulus in the book of Acts. 
Since Paul was an apostle to the Gentiles - the nations - he may have wanted to use his Roman name to better connect with his audience. It would show that the Gospel is for all, not just for Jews. It would serve as a kind of bridge between the two cultures - Roman and Jewish. 

B. He considered himself to be a slave. Jesus said His disciples were His friends, so why did Paul call himself a slave?

I’ll put on my housewife, mother, & now Grandma super heroine cape to answer. I serve all of them, but I don’t have to. I want to. 

Well, sometimes I tell them to do it themselves, but that may be serving them as well. If I do everything for them, how will they learn to serve others? 

We serve our loved ones. All of us serve one another in a family - or we should. 

It is our duty motivated by love. The family of God is no different.

Galatians 5:13
New Living Translation
For you have been called to live in freedom, my brothers and sisters. But don’t use your freedom to satisfy your sinful nature. Instead, use your freedom to serve one another in love.

We use our freedom to serve one another. Sounds like one of those Biblical paradoxes that so many in our crazy world find so hard to understand. 

One is either free or a slave. It can’t be both. Yet it is. Look to Jesus for more instruction. 

C. Called

What is your vocation - your calling?  Hmmm. Paul’s was to be an apostle. An apostle is one sent on a special mission - a missionary. 

Our main purpose here on this earth is to glorify God and help others come to now Him. We are sent into the world as Christians - little Christs. That’s pretty scary when you think about it. 

The goal of our life - the telos - is to know God.


Here’s how the Westminster Shorter Catechism puts it. 


Q. 1. What is the chief end of man?A. Man’s chief end is to glorify God, [a] and to enjoy him for ever. [b][a]. Ps. 86:9Isa. 60:21Rom. 11:361 Cor. 6:2010:31; Rev.4:11[b]. Ps. 16:5-11144:15Isa. 12:2Luke 2:10Phil. 4:4; Rev.21:3-4
What area are you supposed to live this mission out? We are all called to be servants and even sent ones, but not all have the same job. See the Body of Christ teaching in Romans 8 and 1 Corinthians 12, etc. 

In our world, bearing and raising children is supposed to be a secondary vocation. In God’s economy, there is nothing more blessed and important. See the Blessed Virgin as an example of this, as well as St. Joseph. The Holy Family is the prototype. 

That is revolutionary thinking in our day, and it was back in the 1st Century. 

Then we all have other jobs we do. 

How do you put it altogether? 

Paul’s first priority was to serve God. The rest flows from that, I guess. 

Then the idea of God’s calling leads to a lot of deep thinking! I’ll leave it there for now. 

D. The Gospel of God

Good News
From God
About God

Summary of the Gospel - Christ’s death, burial, resurrection, appearance to His followers


Chapter 15[a]The Gospel Teaching.[b] Now I am reminding you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you indeed received and in which you also stand. Through it you are also being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you, unless you believed in vain. [c]For I handed on to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures; that he was buried; that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures; that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. After that he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one born abnormally, he appeared to me. For I am the least[d] of the apostles, not fit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me has not been ineffective. Indeed, I have toiled harder than all of them; not I, however, but the grace of God [that is] with me. 11 Therefore, whether it be I or they, so we preach and so you believed.

Christ didn’t just die for our sins. He rose again from the dead. He didn’t just rise from the dead. He spent time with His followers after He rose. 

Certitude. 

Well, so much more can be said, and has been said. 

Now to memorize it...and keep thinking about it...